I lately
joined Goodreads, (check me out!)
and I am loving using their electronic book shelf to build my tbr list and also
mark off what I’ve already read. What’s stymieing me? The ratings. 1-5 stars
should be simple enough, right?
5 = I’d
recommend it to everyone, I loved it
4 = I really enjoyed it but it wasn’t perfect
3 = Passable, it was a good time, but I wouldn’t go out of my way to recommend it
2 = You’d have to be bad for me to give you this 2, I’d warn people off of your books and want my money back
1 = Holy shit, you are giving books a bad name. I wish I’d never met you.
4 = I really enjoyed it but it wasn’t perfect
3 = Passable, it was a good time, but I wouldn’t go out of my way to recommend it
2 = You’d have to be bad for me to give you this 2, I’d warn people off of your books and want my money back
1 = Holy shit, you are giving books a bad name. I wish I’d never met you.
See, here’s
my problem. I need a different set of rankings for each genre, and I can’t be
the only one who feels this way. Let’s talk my two favorites, Romance versus
Spec Fic. (ie fantasy and sci fi) (also note: I write and love both genres)
Now, for me,
what makes a good romance is sizzling romantic/sexual tension, not just sex sex
sex. In fact if they never even get to the sex part, I’m fine with that. But
when their eyes meet and they have that, “I feel like I’m going to die if I don’t
have you, but I can’t” moment, I swoon. That’s the good stuff. The anticipation,
the warring. But I digress.
Romances, as
we know, are constrained a bit more by formula than SF is. There pretty much
HAS to be a HEA (happily ever after), the main characters are going to be the
Hero and Heroine who fall in love, they’re going to fight against it before
they give in, and so on. This type of story can be done intricately, uniquely,
beautifully, breath-takingly, originally and artfully. Formula doesn’t mean
bad. It just means…restrictive.
I’ll be
honest. The first book I ever came up with was Sworn Sword, a high fantasy
novel. The first book I ever wrote
was Dishonorable Intentions, a historical romance. Why? I found writing within
the structure of a romance just (and don’t hate me for this) easier. I could
give the whole “easy to do, hard to do well” argument and so on, but you know I
love romance, so you can assume I have nothing but respect for it.
Let me be
very honest here, it’s easier to plot a romance, and because the main focus of
the story HAS to be on the romance, the rest of the plot is by necessity, simpler.
Where am I
going with this, you ask? The rankings.
For me (and I
think this has to be true of others) a romance novel that’s a 5 just isn’t the
same as an epic fantasy that’s a 5. There’s just so much more to an epic
fantasy novel. Character development, plotting, themes, world building…it’s no
contest. And there’s nothing wrong with
that. As much as I hate the saying, “it
is what it is” is valid here.
I’ll happily
give great romance novels like Sealed with a Curse by Cecy Robson a 5 on Goodreads, but I wish
I could say “5 for a romance” so people don’t think I think it’s on par with
Melanie Rawn’s Dragon Prince, which is a 5 million for fantasy. (Is 5 million
stars a valid ranking? It should be.)
How do you
feel about giving 5’s in one genre vs another?